设为首页收藏本站

僚人家园

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

点击进入授权页面

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

搜索
查看: 6909|回复: 30
打印 上一主题 下一主题

南京都来贵州寻根,吴越人也该来僚乡寻根了!

[复制链接]

261

主题

0

听众

1万

积分

版主

Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12

最后登录
2019-2-26
注册时间
2002-5-26
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-12-16 01:24:00 |只看该作者 |正序浏览

来僚乡看看你们祖先是怎样生活的??
贵州屯堡:“寻根”情结牵动南京人

发布时间:2005-12-5  新闻摘自: 新华网贵州频道

新华网贵州频道12月4日专电(记者李春惠)近来, “到贵州寻找600年前的老汉人”的标语,多次出现在南京的大街小巷。“寻根问祖”的情结一头牵着南京人,一头牵着贵州省安顺市屯堡人。
600年前,一批南京人背井离乡,来到今天贵州省安顺市天龙山下戍边,将南京当地的文化、风俗习惯、言谈话语、衣着服饰一并带来了。弹指之间,600年过去。如今,他们的子孙后代依然保留着明代的服饰、口音和生活习俗。

走进屯堡,踏上青砖铺成的街道,家家户户的门窗都装饰有各种图案的木雕,四合院带着江淮建筑的特征,相同风格的住宅连成一片,笼罩着江淮文化氛围,令人顿生置身江南小镇的感觉。

贵州屯堡文化与南京文化的历史渊源,互动性强,南京人寻根的渴望,搭建起屯堡人与江南人情感交流的桥梁,促进了屯堡旅游的繁荣。
新华网贵州频道12月4日专电(记者李春惠)近来, “到贵州寻找600年前的老汉人”的标语,多次出现在南京的大街小巷。“寻根问祖”的情结一头牵着南京人,一头牵着贵州省安顺市屯堡人。
600年前,一批南京人背井离乡,来到今天贵州省安顺市天龙山下戍边,将南京当地的文化、风俗习惯、言谈话语、衣着服饰一并带来了。弹指之间,600年过去。如今,他们的子孙后代依然保留着明代的服饰、口音和生活习俗。

走进屯堡,踏上青砖铺成的街道,家家户户的门窗都装饰有各种图案的木雕,四合院带着江淮建筑的特征,相同风格的住宅连成一片,笼罩着江淮文化氛围,令人顿生置身江南小镇的感觉。

贵州屯堡文化与南京文化的历史渊源,互动性强,南京人寻根的渴望,搭建起屯堡人与江南人情感交流的桥梁,促进了屯堡旅游的繁荣。

分享到: QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
转播转播0 分享淘帖0 分享分享0 收藏收藏0 支持支持0 反对反对0
帖子永久地址: 

僚人家园 - 论坛声明1、本主题所有言论和图片仅代表作者个人的立场,不代表本论坛管理方立场。
2、本站所有主题由该帖子作者发表,该帖子作者与僚人家园享有帖子相关版权
3、其他单位或个人使用或转载本论坛原创文章时须征得作者本人及僚人家园论坛管理员的同意
4、发帖者承担因本文发表而直接或间接导致的相关责任。僚人家园管理团队有事先不通知发帖者而删除或屏蔽本文的权利。

欢迎光临七彩云南民族服饰淘宝网店 http://shop34681401.taobao.com/
回复

使用道具 举报

164

主题

0

听众

2万

积分

违规用户

Rank: 2Rank: 2

最后登录
2006-10-31
注册时间
2003-9-28
31#
发表于 2006-1-16 12:24:00 |只看该作者

http://www.public.asu.edu/~aperez7/TONALITY.html

Tonality in Phan Rang Cham and Tsat

The results presented concern the two Chamic languages which have had the greatest contact with tone languages, namely Phan Rang Cham and Tsat. These languages have been under the prolonged influence of Vietnamese and the Min dialects of Chinese respectively. These have undergone a great variety of phonological, morphological and syntactic changes in response to contact with tone languages and the development of bilingual communities that define the forefront of language change.

Monosyllabicity

Although the development of tonality in Asiatic languages is usually associated the simplification of the syllable onset and coda, in Chamic languages, we should first consider the process by which the monosyllables came into being (Haudricourt, 1954; Huffman, 1977; Thompson, 1976). Cham, like all other Malay languages had a characteristic disyllabic (two syllables) word structure. In this system, stress is typically even over both syllables and all vowels in the vowel inventory occur in both syllables. Even before contact with tonal Vietnamese or Chinese languages, we have important evidence for contact with speakers of non-tonal Mon-Khmer languages, confirming the presence of people related to the modern day Khmer living in what is today southern Việt Nam and the Mekong Delta before the arrival of the Cham in the 2nd century and certainly the Vietnamese in the 15th century.

The Mon-Khmer languages exhibit what has been called sesquisyllabicity. While the basic word is disyllabic, the stress has shifted to the second syllable and the vowel of the initial syllable, whatever it may have been originally, is reduced to a neutral schwa [ə], rendering the first syllable an appendage of the central second. This is an important transformation, since it sets the conditions for the loss of the initial syllable through continued weakening and the development of a monosyllabic tone language.

The following chart shows the development from proto-Cham to Western Cham (non-tonal) and Tsat, a fully tonal language:

Syllable Reduction

Proto-Cham W. Cham Tsat

  • picah pacah tsa55 broken

    pluh pluh piu55 ten

    dadit tadi?[†] thi?42 fan

    anak anə? na?24 child

    laŋit laŋi? ŋi?24 sky

    Phan Rang Cham Tonogenesis

    Initial Classes Resulting Register Resulting Tones

    High Tone (final glottal)

    Proto-Chamic High Register

    Non-Voiced Obstruents High Tone (final non-glottal)

    Low Tone (final glottal)

    Proto-Chamic Low Register

    Voiced Obstruents Low Tone (final non-glottal)

    Phan Rang Cham (Eastern Cham) exhibits incipient tonality, that is, many other distinguishing features of the syllable, such as final -h, have not quite disappeared, but it appears to show tonal variation consistent with the model (Han et al., 1992; Thurgood, 1996; Thurgood, 1999). This is not uncontroversial, however, and there are arguments against this model, citing little evidence for the projected loss of final -h and other markers in the future (Brunelle, to appear).

    Tsat Tonogenesis

    Initial Classes Resulting Register Resulting Tones

    55 (final -h)

    Proto-Chamic High Register 24 (final glottal)

    Non-Voiced Obstruents 33 (final voiced)

    55 (final -h)

    Proto-Chamic Low Register 42 (final glottal)

    Voiced Obstruents 11 (final voiced)

    Tsat is spoken by 4 500 speakers on Hải Nam (海南) Island in southern China, Tsat is remarkable for having developed a full tonal system comparable to those of the Southern Min Chinese dialects. As seen in the syllable reduction chart above, Tsat is fully monosyllabic and fully tonal as well having syntactically transformed into what appears typologically as a Chinese language (Thurgood, 1992; Thurgood and Li, 2002; Thurgood and Li, to appear).

    Conclusion

    The data above allow an appreciation of the importance of the Mon-Khmer contact in the development of tones - the reduction from complete polysyllables to sesquisyllabic word roots set the stage for the acquisition of tone through further reduction of the vestigial syllable. This confirms contact between Mon-Khmer and Cham people was extensive prior to the arrival of the Vietnamese, and although most Cham fled the area of the Champa federation in the 15th century, the descendants of the Mon-Khmer remain as the indigenous population of the Mekong Delta (Kampuchea Krom) and the southern highlands.

    The flight of Cham people to southern China, inland Việt Nam and Cambodia was accompanied by further series of changes, each indicative of the new populations these refugees encountered. However, the development of all modern Cham languages can be traced back to the Champa federation period, and represent, in all their variations, a Malay language with considerable Mon-Khmer influence, thus providing linguists with a chronological benchmark for further study and anthropologists a window on the development of a population in the process of linguistic, religious, artistic and political differentiation. Further research could focus on the less studied Chamic languages, including Tsat, but also Jarai and Rhade, which are under considerable pressure as minority languages. Additionally, Western Cham in Cambodia and Eastern Cham in Việt Nam, while not official languages in any capacity, have achieved acceptance as vehicles of communication and education and are in various stages of standardization - a process which involves a certain amount of self-conscious tinkering with the language and would be of interest to socio-linguists. Another possibility would be the study of the disyllabic Jawi Malay languages of Malaysia near the Thai border and Thailand itself. These do not appear to have developed tonality despite centuries of Thai influence. If true, this may provide further evidence for the importance of syllable reduction in tonogenesis, confirming that Cham tonality is not merely a product of Vietnamese and Chinese influences, but instead, the end result of prolonged contact with Mon-Khmer peoples which made tonal developments possible.

    Bibliography

    Brunelle M (to appear) Eastern Cham as a Register Language. Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Han PV, Edmondson J, and Gregerson K (1992) Eastern Cham as a tone language. Mon-Khmer Studies 20:31-43.

    Haudricourt AG (1954) De l'origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242:69-82.

    Huffman FE (1977) An Examination of Lexical Correspondences between Vietnamese and some other Austroasiatic Languages. Lingua 43:171-198.

    Thompson LC (1976) Proto Viet-Muong Phonology: Austroasiatic Studies II. Manoa: University Press of Hawai'i, pp. 1113-1204.

    Thurgood G (1992) From atonal to tonal in Utsat (a Chamic language of Hainan). Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 145-156.

    Thurgood G (1996) Language contact and the directionality of internal "drift": The development of tone and register in Chamic. Language 71:1-31.

    Thurgood G (1999) From ancient Cham to modern dialects: Two thousand years of language contact and change. Manoa: University of Hawai'i Press.

    Thurgood G, and Li F (2002) Contact induced variation and syntactic change in the Tsat of Hainan. Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.

    Thurgood G, and Li F (to appear) From Malay to Sinitic: The Restructuring of Tsat under Intense Contact. California State University, Chico.


  • Tsat tones are represented by a sequence of two numbers. In this system, 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest. Together both numbers represent the contour from one pitch level to another. 55 is a level high pitch, 33 is a level middle pitch, 24 is a rising tone etc...

  • [†] ? = glottal stop


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    30#
    发表于 2006-1-16 11:59:00 |只看该作者

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsat_language

    Tsat language

    Tsat (also known as Utsat, Utset, Huihui, Hui, or Hainan Cham) is a language spoken on Hainan Island in China by the Utsuls. Tsat is a member of the Malayo-Polynesian group within the Austronesian language family, and is related to the Cham languages, originally from the coast of present-day Vietnam.

    Unusually for a Malayo-Polynesian language, Tsat has developed into a solidly tonal language, probably as a result of areal linguistic effects and contact with Chinese, Hlai/Li, and the other tonal languages of Hainan.


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    29#
    发表于 2006-1-16 11:58:00 |只看该作者

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utsul

    Utsul

    The Utsuls are a tiny ethnic group which lives on the Chinese island of Hainan. They are thought to be descendants of Cham refugees who fled their homeland in what is now southern Vietnam to escape from Annamese invasion.

    While most of the Chams who fled Champa went to neighbouring Cambodia, a small business class fled northwards. How they came to acquire the name Utsul is unknown.

    Although they are culturally distinct from their neighbours, the Chinese government places them as members of the Hui nationality. They are speakers of the Tsat language.


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    28#
    发表于 2006-1-16 11:57:00 |只看该作者
    以下是引用毕兹卡在2006-1-14 2:30:00的发言:

    三亚市羊栏镇的回族人,是从越南占城迁来,但他们的语言不是占城语

    是多音节阿拉伯语,变成单音节的语言.这个语言学界已有定论.

    根據維基的資料,回輝話就是占城話的演變耶。

    跟其他的馬來語一樣,占城話都是包括阿拉伯話成份的耶。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    27#
    发表于 2006-1-16 11:44:00 |只看该作者
    以下是引用在2005-12-22 12:47:54的发言:

    强烈反对北姑的这个论断。吴越及岭南一带其它越族人应该是同根生的兄弟民族,并不能说吴越就是百越的源头。只是吴越与华夏文明在地理上较为接近,并参加了中原的称霸,而为华夏民族所认知,并载入史册。而岭南及西南的越人在早期因没有与华夏民族进行接触而没有史料记载,但并不等于他们的古代文明就不存在耶(咦,我怎么也说“耶”了)。

    我只能夠說中國歷史之中,百越這個概念是以吳越為始的耶,若果僚人、泰人或其他人有其他資料的話,北姑一樣會引用的耶,不過可惜沒有耶,連越南歷史也是如此說的耶。

    而且也只是指文化而不是種族耶,中國歷史也沒有說嶺南百越是來自吳越地區的耶。

    嶺南百越也接受了相當的楚國文化耶。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    26#
    发表于 2006-1-16 11:40:00 |只看该作者
    以下是引用Haeuxseng在2005-12-22 12:30:20的发言:

    姑姑的话似乎不对吧?没听说过吴越是百越的源头这样的话。一味的以为强就是头了,这是什么想法啊!

    這個是中國歷史以吳越人作為百越的基準而已,越南歷史也是指祖先雒越來自長江以南一帶的耶。

    北姑沒有能力去發掘事實,故只能夠引經據典耶。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    7

    主题

    1

    听众

    457

    积分

    水精灵

    Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

    最后登录
    2013-5-1
    注册时间
    2003-5-20
    25#
    发表于 2006-1-14 02:30:00 |只看该作者

    三亚市羊栏镇的回族人,是从越南占城迁来,但他们的语言不是占城语

    是多音节阿拉伯语,变成单音节的语言.这个语言学界已有定论.


    富尼 岔,窝火 毕兹卡 网站 恩及(大家好欢迎光临土家族网站http://www.brassett.org.uk/tujia/chome.html(土家族语言文化网)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    7

    主题

    1

    听众

    457

    积分

    水精灵

    Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4

    最后登录
    2013-5-1
    注册时间
    2003-5-20
    24#
    发表于 2006-1-14 02:27:00 |只看该作者

    古时岭南,那里人类生活特别困难,所以人口是非常少的,那时繁华的中原人口也不多;

    岭南最早的是小黑人,后来九黎从中原经湖南迁来,后来越人迁来,黎(俚)人再南迁到海南岛.

    而临高人是在越人南迁时,在还未和壮\布依\水等民族分化时就迁到海南岛的越人.所以现在他们自己没有壮族认同,他们不属于黎人,故当然也不会有黎族认同.


    富尼 岔,窝火 毕兹卡 网站 恩及(大家好欢迎光临土家族网站http://www.brassett.org.uk/tujia/chome.html(土家族语言文化网)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    144

    主题

    1

    听众

    1万

    积分

    版主

    Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12

    最后登录
    2014-10-22
    注册时间
    2003-7-10
    23#
    发表于 2005-12-22 12:47:00 |只看该作者
    以下是引用北姑在2005-12-16 10:11:21的发言:
    吳越乃百越的源頭耶,應該是僚人到吳越尋根耶。

    强烈反对北姑的这个论断。吴越及岭南一带其它越族人应该是同根生的兄弟民族,并不能说吴越就是百越的源头。只是吴越与华夏文明在地理上较为接近,并参加了中原的称霸,而为华夏民族所认知,并载入史册。而岭南及西南的越人在早期因没有与华夏民族进行接触而没有史料记载,但并不等于他们的古代文明就不存在耶(咦,我怎么也说“耶”了)。


    对于未来,我们无可预知!所以,我们不能因为对未来的不确定或自以为预知了未来所发生的事,而放弃了我们本应该要走的路!
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    4

    主题

    0

    听众

    2266

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2007-1-22
    注册时间
    2005-4-30
    22#
    发表于 2005-12-22 12:30:00 |只看该作者

    姑姑的话似乎不对吧?没听说过吴越是百越的源头这样的话。一味的以为强就是头了,这是什么想法啊!


    滥兮抃草滥予?昌桓泽予?昌州州湛。州焉乎秦胥胥,缦予乎昭澶秦踰渗。惿随河湖。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    21#
    发表于 2005-12-22 12:10:00 |只看该作者
    還有回輝話呢,乃屬於馬來語系的占城話耶。

    回复

    使用道具 举报

    3

    主题

    1

    听众

    909

    积分

    山精灵

    Rank: 6Rank: 6Rank: 6Rank: 6Rank: 6Rank: 6

    最后登录
    2009-3-19
    注册时间
    2005-12-21
    20#
    发表于 2005-12-22 11:58:00 |只看该作者
    海南省讲临高话的人也要寻根了,海南省有近50多万人讲着和海南话(闽南方言)完全不一样的话,分部在临高县全县、海口市郊区的6个镇,和几个县的部分村,85年临高县因为要 确定临高人的族别问题曾经邀请中央民委的专家来研究,曾经到过广西、 福建等地考察,确认临高话是壮语的一个分支,70%和壮语接近。

    回复

    使用道具 举报

    773

    主题

    1

    听众

    3万

    积分

    超级版主

    Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13Rank: 13

    最后登录
    2018-9-1
    注册时间
    2003-3-15
    19#
    发表于 2005-12-20 09:07:00 |只看该作者
    以下是引用依维在2005-12-16 1:28:34的发言:
    我看屯堡人不是汉人啊!!!

    他们不会说布依话,而且有强烈的汉族认同!尽管衣着跟周围的布依族差别不大。在1980年前,贵州民族杂居地区的农村,汉族与布依族衣着款式基本相同,外地人是区分不出来的。而本地的汉族和布依族都能区分,本质差别是:布依族以着自织布料为荣,汉族以着机织布料为耀。再细些区别,布依族的衣着有手工挑花图案,而汉族没有!


    有容乃大 自强不息
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    18#
    发表于 2005-12-19 09:57:00 |只看该作者

    越人據說乃夏人之後耶,不過發源地乃長江中下游一帶耶,而非未開發的嶺南耶。越南歷史也是說祖先駱越來自長江中下游一帶耶。

    而吳人乃南下越化的東夷耶。

    我也很想知道吳越源自嶺南的說法從何而來耶,就好像台灣乃南島系發源地一樣耶。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    23

    主题

    1

    听众

    5034

    积分

    东灵神

    Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12

    最后登录
    2012-10-3
    注册时间
    2003-7-23
    17#
    发表于 2005-12-17 21:26:00 |只看该作者
    吴越由岭南迁出,然后吴越比岭南发达了,继而反过来影响岭南越人,这也是很有可能的呀。

    Nandao ni xianzai hai bu zhidao?
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    16#
    发表于 2005-12-17 10:58:00 |只看该作者

    如何為之古越風呢?吳越人儘管跟中原融合程度較深,不過仍然保持不少吳越風俗耶。

    至少現在吳語群體仍然保留獨特的語言及文化,沒有跟中原完全融合耶。

    古越人本身也是融合出來的亞種,而古越文化其實也是融合文化耶,那古越人又能否說成是矮黑人或南下黃種人的敗類呢?個人認為,不要說得太盡耶,還有留有餘地好。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    261

    主题

    0

    听众

    1万

    积分

    版主

    Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12Rank: 12

    最后登录
    2019-2-26
    注册时间
    2002-5-26
    15#
    发表于 2005-12-16 22:48:00 |只看该作者

    到底是吴越人从僚乡迁出还是僚人从吴越之地迁出还是原地活动,谁都下不了定论!但有一点可以肯定!现代僚人保留下来的"古越风"要比吴越人保留下来的要浓得多了,吴越人汉化太严重了,他们没有权利继承"古越文化"的资格,配不上当古越人的后裔!!他们不够格!!他们是古越族的败类.他们把老祖宗留下的"古越文化"这笔丰厚的财产践踏得面目全非!!!

    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-16 22:49:43编辑过]

    欢迎光临七彩云南民族服饰淘宝网店 http://shop34681401.taobao.com/
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    14#
    发表于 2005-12-16 12:55:00 |只看该作者

    http://www.china10k.com/simp/history/1/11/11b/11b23/11b2312.htm

    河姆渡文化

    新石器时代晚期文化,年代距今约6950-5330年。因首先发现于浙江余姚河姆渡遗址,故名,分布于宁绍平原。遗址中保存有成堆的稻谷、谷壳、稻杆和稻叶,一般厚二十至五十厘米。与稻作农业相适应,农具中的骨耜数量特别多,上面凿孔装柄,以方便使用。出土遗物共六千多件,其中多为骨器,也有陶器、玉器、木器。木器相当发达,既有铲、桨、杵、锤等生产工具,也有碗、盆等生活用具。有一件碗上还发现有朱红色涂料,经化验,涂料实为生漆,这是中国最早的漆器。

    房屋建筑颇为特别。这是一种干栏式的建筑,先在地上打成排的桩木,上面架梁,然后铺设楼板,形成架空的房基。上面再立柱、架梁、封顶。由于南方天气潮湿,这种木构建筑非常有优越性,现在云南的一些地方还可以见到。


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    164

    主题

    0

    听众

    2万

    积分

    违规用户

    Rank: 2Rank: 2

    最后登录
    2006-10-31
    注册时间
    2003-9-28
    13#
    发表于 2005-12-16 12:53:00 |只看该作者

    http://www.china10k.com/simp/history/1/11/11b/11b23/11b2320.htm

    华南印纹陶文化

    新石器时代晚期,中国南方的江西、福建、广东、广西、云南出现了一种很有特色的陶器。这种陶器烧制坚硬,犹如瓷器,故名硬陶。陶器表面拍印一些方格纹、圆圈纹、曲折纹等几何形纹饰。由于它的分布范围相当广泛,因此人们把出有这种陶器的古代文化称为印纹陶文化。它的延续时间也很长,一直到商周时期的遗址还有发现,而且流传到北方中原地区。它们往往是作为珍贵的器物埋藏在帝王贵族的大墓中


    回复

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册  

    允许回帖同步到新浪微博  

    Archiver|手机版|壮族在线    

    GMT+8, 2025-8-24 15:45 , Processed in 0.172709 second(s), 45 queries .

    Powered by Discuz! X2.5

    © 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

    回顶部