(a) The Shan Kingdom of “ Mu Aarn Mao” was founded in 94 BC, which was the 450 Buddhist Era. The “Mu Aarn Mao” was also known as “Sing Mong Keng Wi” or “Mong Long Poong Tai”
(b) In the old scripts, the Abbot of Man Hai- Selan, had ten that in the year 450 of Buddha’s Era, there was the assem-bly of 150 learned Buddhist monks, where they re-wrote the three divisions of Buddha’s doctrine (i.e the Buddhist Syod)
Later, among these monks, “Sao Hsawta” was sent to the Shan lands and “Sao Mitsantaka” was sent to China, on mission to teach Buddhism.
(c) In another version, “Sao Khun Sai a.k.a. Sao Khun Hong” the son of the king of Mong T’sen (modern Yunnan) with his four followers: 1. Sao Khun Ling 2. Pu Larb Leng 3. Kha Wong Hork, 4. Kha Wong Phong, went to fetch the Buddha’s doctrine in the land of “Phar Tang Phar Taw” On their return they reached home in the 450 BE, in the time of New Year and new harvest. The people welcomed and of fered them with food from their new harvests. And the Shan year was reinstitute since that time.
So, the Shan year (Pi Tai) was based on the 450 BE.
The Shan year = BE-450
eg. = 2543-450
=2093 (1999 AD)
As Buddhism was the state religion, and this “Pi Mong” was widely used in most Tai groups. It is also used in Burma, and was also known as Kawsa or Burmese Era. So, the Shans had two calendars, the Shan and the “Pi Mong or Kawsa” in which the latter was more commonly used.
The “pi Mong” was based on the old year in the Indian calendar, but due to the astrologer’s foretold the future of the state, the year was revised down or adjusted down and restarted.
(1) Before the Buddha’s Era, “King Insana” the king of Kapilawood , subtracted 6845 from the great year (Maha) 6847 , leaving “2” which renew up to the year of “103” year, Wednesday. The sixth full moon day,( in Shan Calendar) when Prince “Sidatha” became the enlightened “Gaudama”. In the year of 183, Tuesday, the sixth moon day, the Lord expired and entered “Nivarna”
(2) Four months after the Lord “Gautama” had entered “Nirvarna”; King “Asathadat” re-established the Calendar. The year was counted “1” which was the year of the Buddha’s Era. In the year “424” the King of “Srikristra” tried to re-establish, but failed without the participation of the people.
(3) In the year of “624” BE. King “Sumudri” of “Srikristra” re-established the calendar, liaving “2” to start.
(4) Then after the year reached 562, King “Popa Saw Rahan” of “Pagna or Pookham” subtracted 560 leaving “2”. It was from this 2nd year which is now reached 1361 and was also known as the Burmese Era.
By Khur Hsen
This abstraction and re-instituting of the calendar had occurred, due to one of these facts. (1) According to the Prophecies. (2) When there were bad weathers, drought or flood, or destruction by pests, which resulted in famine. (3) The King simply wants to show his might and generosity to his subjects.
The kings who had abstracted and reinstitute the calendar, was usually expired within that year. They had to sacrifice their lives, for of their people.
四海最早的时候也有一个经常谈掸邦的
可现在不见来了
四海最早的时候也有一个经常谈掸邦的
可现在不见来了
不是F
是之前的一个
四海最早开始的时候就来了
我看以前的帖子里经常看见他的身影，从他的言论里觉得他是比较支持汉族的（这点和F很像）
不是F
是之前的一个
四海最早开始的时候就来了
我看以前的帖子里经常看见他的身影，从他的言论里觉得他是比较支持汉族的（这点和F很像）
我不知道了，我是今年年初才知道这个论坛的。
想起来了
那个人叫“ XIAOLIN”
http://www.rauz.net/bbs/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=2815&page=57
想起来了
那个人叫“ XIAOLIN”
http://www.rauz.net/bbs/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=2815&page=57
看了，原来是缅甸的留学生，在湖北上大学，估计已经毕业了。
不是F
是之前的一个
四海最早开始的时候就来了
我看以前的帖子里经常看见他的身影，从他的言论里觉得他是比较支持汉族的（这点和F很像）
真的假的，看了帖子还猜不出XIAOLIN和F版的关系，我看第一眼就觉得有很密切的关系，不用向任何人求证。
真的假的，看了帖子还猜不出XIAOLIN和F版的关系，我看第一眼就觉得有很密切的关系，不用向任何人求证。
你知道就告诉我嘛
难道他们是同一人？
不会吧，那个XIAOLIN是MM哦
鄙视你这小气胞
哦哦哦哦
有可能是同一人
可“他”到底是GG还是MM捏
我还记得F这家伙发过一个说掸邦是怎么打败蒙古军队的帖子
诶南还曾经批评他说中国不承认掸邦呢
哈哈！
| 欢迎光临 僚人家园 (http://bbs.rauz.net.cn/) | Powered by Discuz! X2.5 |